Partner academy rules
Partners should define target cohort, pathway goals, evidence expectations and review responsibilities before launch.
Partner Terms
Partner Terms
Partner Academies should run with clear governance on participant consent, evidence handling, reporting boundaries and impact claims.
Cohort data handling
Participant-level data should be handled under approved access controls with privacy-aware reporting defaults.
Participant consent
Partners should secure participant consent where required for evidence sharing, reporting and research participation.
Impact reporting
Partner reports should distinguish participation, evidence quality, lab outcomes, mission outcomes and remaining capability gaps.
Aggregated or anonymized reporting should be used where participant-level disclosure is not necessary.
Mission use and safeguarding
Partner missions should avoid exposing confidential or sensitive participant information and should include safeguarding controls where minors are involved.
Branding and claims
Partners should not publish fake impact statistics, fabricated learner records or misleading success claims.
Funding and payment terms
Commercial terms, pilot funding structures and payment clauses should be finalized through signed agreements and legal review.
Reporting limitations
Partner reports should include limitations and avoid overstating what evidence can prove in each context.
Legal review note
Certifiedge policies should be reviewed by qualified legal and data protection professionals before formal launch, especially where learner data, employer access, payments, minors, research participation or cross-border users are involved.